AM I REALLY SAVING MYSELF MONEY? TODAY I WILL SAVE 100 PLN TO LOSE 1000 PLN TOMORROW

The habit of ‘saving’ money on specialist services has a fully quantifiable (negative) effect, we have seen this in practice.
Examples?
It is important to note that being aware of expenditure and trying to limit costs is completely understandable and admirable. This trend is especially reinforced in the case of intangible services, where we do not buy physical goods from a store shelf, but services or knowledge, e.g. legal security of transactions.
A customer buying a service (which cannot be seen, therefore more difficult to appreciate) sometimes manifests a strong desire to question any given component of the cost and the desire to cut the scope of service to a minimum. This is of course the customer’s prerogative and we respect it. However, some services cost as much as they do because they require, for example, a lot of work to be carried out by an experienced specialist. Failure to do such work comes with (negative) consequences. We describe below one of the issues this causes.
Example no. 1 – “Deal of a lifetime”
A client finds a foreign buyer for a very attractive property. Given the rate of return the client can achieve from the investment after only a few years, this should be considered a great deal. A significant investor, several million PLN coming in to the vendor’s bank account, a high rate of return on investment. Congratulations!
Unfortunately, the buyer is in a strong position, an aggressive stance to transfer the risk of the transaction onto the vendor, including of course requesting personal guarantees, cause resistance from the vendor. The very structure of complex property ownership matters requires advanced legal engineering. This is not helped by the attitude of the buyer who does not want to bear transaction costs. The issue here is that the risk lies with a seller who is still pondering whether he/she should actually use the help of advisers! Additionally, there is a further risk – the failure to close the deal as a result of increasing tension between the parties.
It is at this stage that our law firm was asked to bring about a successful conclusion to the negotiations between the parties. The vendor’s attitude wasn’t helpful to the process, they stubbornly insisted on reducing the amount of work carried out by their adviser due to rising costs. We are talking about tens of thousands of PLN in a transaction worth several million. When assessing the potential negative consequences of such approach the following must be taken into account:
- transaction fall through – the buyer loses patience due to the protracted process,
- failure to safeguard the interests of the vendor – even the most aggressive attitude of the counterparty can be overcome – but this entails hiring advisers, i.e. costs(!),
- the long-term effects of failed transactions (market changes – the current pandemic and the potential risk of a possible crash – caused many transactions to fall through) and the ensuing negative consequences for the vendor.
To close off, a rhetorical question. Is it really worth taking such significant risks or even risking the success of a transaction worth several millions of PLN only to save tens of thousands of PLN?
Example 2 – I will save a few thousand to pay several hundred thousand
A promising start-up, looking for finance (who isn’t?!). At the start of its journey it allowed any investor in, which is quite understandable, after all, any capital is welcome and in the short term, this is acceptable and defensible. Except that the lack of adequate legal securities has far-reaching consequences for the future – let’s look at it from a long-term perspective.
What happened?
- the counterparty was an institutional investor,
- the start-up had no advisers (because of the added cost),
- the structure was diluted – investors big and small – because, well… the start-up needed capital.
The outcome was that the statutes of the start-up included a number of provisions stopping the owners from properly running the business and caused them to lose control over the company. When a strategic investor appeared on the horizon, it was necessary to provide the founders with the appropriate tools to wrestle back control over the business and to ensure the remaining shareholders’ cooperation or potential exit, should that be a condition set by the strategic investor.
This was eventually achieved but at a great cost. The founding shareholders had no choice but to agree a high exit price for the benefit of the minority shareholders. The cost of not agreeing the legal framework at the time of investor entry was immense.
The conclusion? If you do not invest at the outset, you will pay exponentially more on exit.
It didn’t have to be that way. For a start-up to set entry conditions for investors isn’t always a deal breaker; quite the opposite in fact. A clear set of conditions, a well thought through legal framework can only strengthen the positive image of the start-up in the eyes of the investor. Given they have engaged in talks and are looking to invest, it can only mean they approve of it. Use this to your advantage! However, please remember, it will cost you money because it requires input from specialists who will be able to help your start-up.

Blog edited by dr Anna Maria Panasiuk

Founder and Managing Partner of Panasiuk & Partners, with many years of expertise in wealth management.
Authors

dr Maja Czarzasty- Hercberg
OF COUNSEL/ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
Dorota Sajewicz
investment partner
dr Adam Barcikowski
Head of Tax | Certified Tax Advisor
Marta Kwiatkowska - Abramowska
legal assistent
Sylwia Rozwandowicz
ADVOCATE
Sylwia Rybicka
dyrektor ds. rozwoju
Michał Nowacki
radca prawny
Paweł Turek
doradca podatkowy
Katarzyna Zając
aplikant radcowski
Yours Panasiuk
Antoni Goraj
radca prawny
Edyta Winnicka
prawnik
Paweł Szumowski
aplikant radcowski
Yours Panasiuk
Katarzyna Bieńkowska
radca prawny,
doradca podatkowy YOURS Panasiuk
Kamil Kowalik
doradca podatkowy
Monika Baran
radca prawny
Adam Apel
doradca podatkowy
Piotr Świąć
adwokat
Sabina Tyszko
tax consultant
Szczepan Adamski
OF COUNSEL | LAWYER | PRESIDENT OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF YOURS SP. Z O.O.
Magda Kwiatkowska
radca prawny
Andrzej Sałamacha
PARTNER | ATTORNEY-AT-LAW | CERTIFIED INSOLVENCY AND RESTRUCTURING ADVISOR
dr Anna Maria Panasiuk
managing partner | advocate | wealth advisor
Maciej Małachowski
TRAINEE ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
Klaudia Borkowska
Advocate trainee
Archives
-
2023
-
2022
-
December
- POLISH FAMILY FOUNDATION – A new solution for entrepreneurs
- POLSKA FUNDACJA RODZINNA – nowe rozwiązanie dla przedsiębiorców
- INVESTMENT FUNDS IN THE NETHERLANDS – ABC OF SETTING UP OF AIF
- FUNDUSZE INWESTYCYJNE W HOLANDII – ABC ZAŁOŻENIA AFI
- TAX INCENTIVES TO INVEST IN AN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND (AIF)
- ZACHĘTY PODATKOWE DO INWESTYCJI W ALTERNATYWNĄ SPÓŁKĘ INWESTYCJNĄ (ASI)
-
November
-
October
- CAN AN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND SERVE THE PURPOSES OF PRIVATE INVESTMENTS?
- CZY ALTERNATYWNA SPÓŁKA INWESTYCYJNA MOŻE SŁUŻYĆ PRYWATNYM INWESTYCJOM?
- M&A – TRANSACTION TRIVIA IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
- M&A – CIEKAWOSTKI TRANSAKCJI MERGERS & ACQUISITION
- HISZPAŃSKA REZYDENCJA PODATKOWA – PUZZLE DLA WTAJEMNICZONYCH!
- Spanish tax residence – jigsaw puzzles for the initiated!
-
September
-
August
-
July
-
May
- PODWÓJNA REZYDENCJA PODATKOWA – 4 PRZYKŁADY POWSTANIA [CZĘŚĆ II OSOBY PRYWATNE]
- DUAL TAX RESIDENCE – 4 EXAMPLES OF ITS EMERGENCE [PART II NATURAL PERSONS]
- INVESTORS’ Q&A ABOUT THE ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS
- O CO NAJCZĘŚCIEJ PYTAJĄ INWESTORZY W KONTEKŚCIE ASI (ALTERNATYWNYCH SPÓŁEK INWESTYCYJNYCH)?
- REVOLUTION ON THE MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS MARKET – RECORD-BREAKING M&A TRANSACTIONS IN POLAND
- REWOLUCJA NA RYNKU FUZJI I PRZEJĘĆ – REKORDOWE TRANSAKCJE M&A W POLSCE
- 7 SINS COMMITTED WHILE RUNNING A BUSINESS AND MAKING INVESTMENTS
- 7 GRZECHÓW PRZY PROWADZENIU BIZNESU I INWESTYCJACH
-
April
-
March
-
February
- SIMPLE CONSERVATIVE INVESTMENTS. HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LAST 20 YEARS
- PROSTE INWESTYCJE KONSERWATYWNE. ANALIZA HISTORYCZNA OSTATNICH 20 LAT
- CZY WARTO ZAMIESZKAĆ W HISZPANII? PRAWO BECKHAMA, CZYLI JAK NIE PŁACIĆ PODATKÓW W HISZPANII
- IS IT WORTH LIVING IN SPAIN? BECKHAM ‘S LAW, HOW TO AVOID PAYING TAXES IN SPAIN
- ESTONIAN CIT 2022 AS A REMEDY FOR THE POLISH DEAL
- ESTOŃSKI CIT 2022 JAKO REMEDIUM NA POLSKI ŁAD
-
January
- HOW CAN YOU SET UP AN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND IN A FEW WEEKS?
- JAK MOŻNA ZAŁOŻYĆ ALTERNATYWNĄ SPÓŁKĘ INWESTYCYJNĄ W KILKA TYGODNI?
- DO CLOSED-END INVESTMENT FUNDS STILL PAY OFF?
- CZY FUNDUSZE INWESTYCYJNE ZAMKNIĘTE JESZCZE SIĘ OPŁACAJĄ?
- 6 REASONS WHY IT IS WORTH DEVELOPING A BUSINESS OUTSIDE POLISH BORDERS
- 6 POWODÓW, DLA KTÓRYCH WARTO ROZWIJAĆ BIZNES POZA POLSKĄ
-
December
-
2021
-
December
-
November
-
October
- LIFE IN TENERIFE – TAXES AND REAL ESTATE IN THE CANARY ISLANDS
- TENERYFA NA ŻYCIE – PODATKI I NIERUCHOMOŚCI NA WYSPACH KANARYJSKICH
- TURNKEY REORGANISATION – HOW TO PREPARE A BUSINESS FOR INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION
- REORGANIZACJA POD KLUCZ CZYLI JAK PRZYGOTOWAĆ BIZNES NA EKSPANSJĘ ZAGRANICZNĄ
- BUSINESS EXPANSION OUTSIDE THE EU – LET’S HAVE A LOOK AT OTHER CONTINENTS
- EKSPANSJA BIZNESU POZA UE – SPÓJRZMY NA INNE KONTYNENTY
-
September
-
August
- MAJĄTEK RODZINNY
- COMPANY RELOCATION WITHIN THE EU: PROCESS ANALYSIS AND CASE STUDY
- PRZENIESIENIE SPÓŁKI W OBRĘBIE UE: ANALIZA PROCESU I CASE STUDY
- SCALING UP BUSINESS. TAXES IN ESTONIA, ITALY, UNITED KINGDOM, MALTA AND CYPRUS – COMPARISON
- EKSPANSJA BIZNESU. PODATKI W EUROPIE.
- POLSKI ŁAD OCZAMI PRZEDSIĘBIORCY
-
July
- EXPANDING NEXT DOOR – THE CZECH REPUBLIC, SLOVAKIA, GERMANY, ROMANIA
- EKSPANSJA PO SĄSIEDZKU – CZECHY, SŁOWACJA, NIEMIECY, RUMUNIA
- CONVERTIBLE DEBT IN POLAND
- CONVERTIBLE DEBT PRZY INWESTYCJACH PRE-SEED
- AIFs (ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS) LEAD THE WAY ON THE POLISH CAPITAL MARKET
- ASI WIEDZIE PRYM NA POLSKIM RYNKU KAPITAŁOWYM
- FAMILY FOUNDATIONS IN POLAND. CONCEPT VERSUS ENTREPRENEURS’ EXPECTATIONS
- FUNDACJA RODZINNA W POLSCE. ISTOTA POMYSŁU A OCZEKIWANIA PRZEDSIĘBIORCÓW
-
June
- CORPORATE TAX RELIEF AND INCENTIVES FOR INVESTORS – NEW (BETTER?) SOLUTIONS
- ULGI PODATKOWE I ZACHĘTY DLA INWESTORÓW – IDZIE NOWE (LEPSZE?)
- 9% CIT ZAMIAST 19%, JAK PŁACIĆ NIŻSZY PODATEK
- CYPRUS VS. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, WHERE TO MOVE? CHANGE OF TAX RESIDENCE
- CYPR VS. ZJEDNOCZONE EMIRATY ARABSKIE, GDZIE SIĘ WYPROWADZIĆ? ZMIANA REZYDENCJI PODATKOWEJ
-
May
-
April
-
March
-
February
-
January
- 6 MAJOR CHANGES IN THE BEHAVIOUR OF PRIVATE INVESTORS AND THEIR PORTFOLIOS IN 2020
- 6 GŁÓWNYCH ZMIAN W ZACHOWANIACH I PORTFELACH INWESTORÓW PRYWATNYCH W ROKU 2020
- TAX SIMPLIFICATION 2021 IN POLAND – A MAGNET FOR FOREIGN INVESTORS
- UPROSZCZENIA PODATKOWE 2021 W POLSCE – MAGNESEM DLA INWESTORÓW ZAGRANICZNYCH
- ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND (AIF) – A FIRST-CLASS INVESTMENT VEHICLE AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
- ALTERNATYWNA SPÓŁKA INWESTYCYJNA (ASI). PIERWSZORZĘDNY WEHIKUŁ INWESTYCYJNY NA WYCIĄGNIĘCIE RĘKI
- ESTONIAN CIT – EFFECTIVE REDUCTION IN CORPORATE TAX IN POLAND
- CIT ESTOŃSKI – EFEKTYWNE OBNIŻENIE OPODATKOWANIA SPÓŁEK W POLSCE
-
December
-
2020
-
December
-
November
- WE BREAK STEREOTYPES! PRECONCEPTIONS ABOUT LAWYERS AND THE REALITY OF BUSINESS
- AM I REALLY SAVING MYSELF MONEY? TODAY I WILL SAVE 100 PLN TO LOSE 1000 PLN TOMORROW
- ŁAMIEMY STEREOTYPY! CZYLI PRZEKONANIA O PRAWNIKACH, A REALIA BIZNESU
- CZY TO NAPRAWDĘ OSZCZĘDNOŚĆ? DZIŚ „ZAOSZCZĘDZĘ” 100 ZŁ ŻEBY JUTRO STRACIĆ 1000 ZŁ
- ZAPRASZAMY do MONAKO
- WHY IS IT WORTH BECOMING A TAX RESIDENT OF MONACO?
- DLACZEGO WARTO ZOSTAĆ REZYDENTEM MONAKO? PODATKI W MONAKO
-
October
-
September
-
August
-
June
- THE WORLD IS CHANGING, AND YOU ARE STILL LOOKING FOR A UNICORN? In this article, we tell you everything you need to know to find one
- ŚWIAT SIĘ ZMIENIA, A TY WCIĄŻ SZUKASZ JEDNOROŻCA. Wszystko co musisz wiedzieć aby go znaleźć napisaliśmy tutaj
- KRYZYSOWE INWESTYCJE, CZYLI: ODWAŻNA INWESTYCJA WYMAGA OSTROŻNEGO PLANOWANIA
- JAK TRWOGA TO DO PRAWNIKA – NIEPOKOJĄCE TENDENCJE WŚRÓD STARTUPÓW
-
May
-
April
- AMERICAN TAX COMPETITION. HELPFUL OR “HARMFUL”
- KONKURENCJA PODATKOWA PO AMERYKAŃSKU. POŻĄDANA, CZY „SZKODLIWA”
- PIENIĄDZE TO NIE WSZYSTKO. Czyli jak inwestować, żeby nie stracić
- INVESTING IN HARD TIMES: HOW TO SET UP YOUR BUSINESS IN NEW YORK
- APETYT NA INWESTYCJE W TRUDNYCH CZASACH. SPÓŁKA W NOWYM YORKU
- WPŁYW PANDEMII NA TRANSAKCJE FUZJI I PRZEJĘĆ
- IMPACT OF A PANDEMIC ON MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
- PODATKI NA TRUDNE CZASY
-
March
-
February
-
December
-
2019
-
2018
-
2017
-
2016
-
2015
-
December
-
November
- Zwrot PCC od czynności restrukturyzacyjnych z udziałem spółek komandytowo-akcyjnych
- Zmiany podatkowe na Cyprze zachętą dla potencjalnych inwestorów
- Cypryjskie fundusze inwestycyjne mogą korzystać ze zwolnienia podatkowego w Polsce
- Nowe sankcje za niezłożenie sprawozdania finansowego
- Europejskie poświadczenie dziedziczenia
-
October
-
July
-
December
Categories
- Alternative Investment Fund (15)
- Expansion (12)
- Investments (34)
- Jurisdictions (11)
- Law (13)
- M&A (11)
- POLISH FAMILY FOUNDATION (1)
- Polish Holding Company (2)
- Relocation (9)
- Reorganisation (6)
- Succession (8)
- Tax (28)
- Tax accounting (2)
- Tax Preferences (2)
- Tax Residence (10)
- Wealth Advisory (8)

New publications
You want to be up to date, enter your e-mail address and you will receive new publications straight to your inbox: